The Tudors History of a Dynasty By David Loades


The Tudors History of a Dynasty
By David Loades

This book is about one of the most powerful and influential dynasties in English history, a dynasty of five monarchs who ruled their domain for over a century. The Tudors were concerned to build a government that would endure, hence their constant concern with the succession – an anxiety which lasted throughout the century.
Although all Tudor monarchs believed that their authority derived from God, they had different ways of expressing that conviction, and above all they believed in ruling with consent and advice. For this reason they built partnerships, not with the old nobility as their predecessors had done, but with the wider community of the gentry, and above all with parliament. They were not in any sense democrats, but the partnerships which they built in church and state lasted for centuries, and still influences the way we look at our politics today.
The Tudor age was an era of momentous religious, social and political chance and David Loades provides an expert overview of this pivotal period of British history.

Initially I thought this book was simply about the lives of each of the Tudor monarchs, but as I began to read I found out it was far, far more than that. This book is truly about its name “The Tudors a History of a Dynasty” as it is not just about the men and women who were the monarchs of the Tudor realm it is about the whole world in which the Tudors lived, from their families to the men and woman that surrounded them at court, to the parliament, to the alliances and wars they had with other countries. David Loades sets his story of the Tudors within the larger world in which they lived and he did a wonderful job of detailing so many important and integral events which have shaped not only Tudor history but the world as which we know it today.

To start this book Loades sets the Tudors in the world in which they came from. He talks about the history of the Tudor name, who the ancestors of the Tudor monarchs were and how they could trace their name back to Queen Catherine de Valois and King Henry VI. Loades them moves on to talk about how King Henry VII came to the throne through defeating King Richard III at the battle of Bosworth and all the details involving his fight to obtain the throne. Loades moves onto talk about how Henry VII set up his Kingdom, his council and his family. 

In his next chapter he talks about Henry VIII the heir to Henry VII and his turbulent marriages and his personal struggle for a son and heir. He details briefly each of Henry VIII’s wives, Catherine of Aragon, Anne Boleyn, Jane Seymour, Anne of Cleves, Katherine Howard and Catherine Parr. I did notice one small mistake in this part in which Loades states that George Boleyn, Lord Rochford was executed on the same day as his sister Anne – May 19th. This is incorrect as history tells us that George Boleyn was executed upon Tower Hill with the other men accused of committing adultery with Anne on May 17th

Moving on from Henry VIII, Loades writes about Henry’s children and how his only living son and heir Edward VI died before he could claim his authority as King and produce heirs of his own. The crown, after a very brief struggle, went to Mary and Loades talks about Mary’s own battles to try and find a balance between being the first successful ruling Queen of England and the need to marry and beget an heir. After Mary’s death Elizabeth, Henry VIII’s youngest daughter, took the throne and once again Loades goes into some detail about her struggle to rule successfully as Queen while juggling the need to marry and give England an heir.

I really enjoyed these few chapters which looked at the Tudor Monarchs; Loades did a wonderful job of outlining each monarch and giving just enough detail to inform the reader without overwhelming them. Obviously books upon books have been written about each individual monarch, but I felt Loades did a wonderful job of summarizing the most important and interesting points of each Tudor monarch.

Moving on from this Loades them looks at the role of Parliament and Government in the reign of the Tudors. He goes into great detail about how Parliament changed and progressed over the one hundred and eighteen years of Tudor rule. He spoke about the uses and needs of Parliament and how these changed throughout the years. He also spoke about the Privy Council and the Privy chamber and how especially Henry VIII used the Privy chamber to gather a few select men around him to be his source of information and council. It was thoroughly interesting to see how the Privy Council and Parliament changed over the years and especially in the latter part of Elizabeth I’s reign how the House of Commons gained more power and was able to better represent the wider people of England. 

In his next chapter Loades talks about how one of the Tudor achievements was the domestication of the nobility. He writes about how once noblemen had their own estates which were like small states within England, each state having rule over themselves. Yet once Henry VII came to the throne and then his heirs, all of this began to change. The Tudor monarchs created rules about what the nobility could and could not do, one of those being how many men they could maintain in their personal armies. No longer could a man of noble status call to him thousands of men, which could be seen as a threat to the Crown, instead he was only allowed to keep some two hundred men. Of course in times of war he could call upon more, but that was extreme circumstances. Loades also writes of how Henry VIII promoted men he had grown up with and who were not necessarily of high and noble birth. These men were relatively low born and relied greatly upon the King for their title and status. Men like this would not oppose the King for they needed him to maintain their status. In the end it would seem that through the Tudor rule many of the nobility lost their claims and became reliant upon the crown for their place within the government and court. 

I thoroughly enjoyed the chapter in which Loades looks at the different Tudor Monarchs international policies and how the greater world viewed England. It was interesting to see the ebb and flow of international relationships, how alliances were created and then destroyed and then created again all within a short span of time. England was never really a major player in the world until the reign of Elizabeth, yet before her Henry VIII and his ego seemed to think they were one of the greatest nations! He entered wars with France several times over his reign and ended up depleting the countries treasury and Parliament was forced to impose taxes to pay for Henry’s desires for war. And yet the common people still loved him because he was seen as a mighty war like King! 

Loades moves on to write about the Tudors and their relationship with the Church and God. Famously history tells us of Henry VIII’s break with the Catholic Church and with the Pope and how he and Parliament created the Church of England. Loades writes about this but he also talks about the little we know of Henry VII’s religious beliefs and how he was a dedicated Catholic, taking pilgrimages and giving to the Church. Yet unfortunately like much of Henry VII we know very little about his personal faith. Loades also looks at religion and the changes made to the Church after Henry VIII’s death. He speaks about Mary I’s determination to reintroduce the Catholic faith to England and reunite the country with Rome and also Elizabeth’s religious beliefs and what she and her council did for religion in the country. 

I really enjoyed the chapter which looked at England as a trading and merchant nation throughout the reign of each of the Tudor monarchs. Loades spent a great deal of time looking at the cloth trade and how that exploded throughout the reigns of Henry VIII, Edward VI and Mary and then how it hit a major hurdle during the reign of Elizabeth I due to the sacking of Antwerp by the Spanish army. Loades also looked at how naval exploration flourished throughout the latter part of Elizabeth I’s reign and how many expeditions and trading routes were set up with other countries. It was interesting to learn about England as a trading country and how people made their trade and money rather than just focusing on the nobility and their wealth.

In the last chapter of this book Loades looks at the public image of each Tudor monarch, both in the time that each monarch reigned and also in terms of how we view them today. It was thoroughly fascinating to see how each monarch from Henry VII through to Elizabeth used various types of propaganda, good works and art to portray themselves in a certain light. Even today, almost five hundred years after his death, many people still know the famous image of Henry VIII standing with his hands near his hips, legs parted, cod piece prominent – an image of strength, virility and power. Certainly each Tudor monarch did an amazing job in portraying themselves to their people, although not every image we remember is necessarily the way the Tudors would want us to remember them! 

In the conclusion of this book Loades takes a step back and looks from today’s perspective at the legacy that the Tudors left the world. As well as having six wives and being one of the most well-known King’s in English history, Henry VIII also made major changes to the English Church and separated the Church from Rome. He also began the building of a bigger and better naval base which grew even more during the reign of his daughter Elizabeth I. During Elizabeth’s reign England began to be seen as a major player in the world, sending out ships for great exploration and trade all throughout the known and unknown world. The Tudors also began many changes in Parliament, using it more and more to push through laws. The use and importance of the House of Commons grew and through this the ‘common’ people of England had a greater say in what happened to their country. As well as this the English language grew in importance. Latin and French used to be the international languages of communication and trade but throughout the reign of the Tudors and by the time of Elizabeth I’s death, the English language was used more and more and became one of the most used languages for trade throughout Europe.

Although the Tudor monarchs reigned almost five hundred years ago they have had a lasting effect upon the world. In today’s times we remember each Tudor monarch for different reasons: the Winter King, Bluff King Hal who changed the course of religion, The Boy king, Bloody Mary, Good Queen Bess. No matter their names we still remember the Tudors because they were larger than life. In this book Loades gives a brief yet interesting overview of each Tudor monarch and then looks at the larger world in which they lived. By doing this Loades creates a detailed picture of life under the reign of the Tudor monarchs. 

I thoroughly enjoyed this book. I like David Loades’ writing style as it is easy to read and straight to the point. I would recommend this book as an introduction to those interested in Tudor history as it gives just enough information without overwhelming the reader. A very good read indeed!


Anne Boleyn Guilty or Innocent? Part 3


Anne Boleyn Guilty or Innocent?
Part 3
On May 19th at 9am, or perhaps a little before, Anne was to leave her chambers in the Queen’s lodgings for the last time. Three years ago she had stayed in the very same lodgings on the night before her coronation. As she left the Queen’s lodgings Anne was accompanied by four ladies in waiting. Leaving her chambers Anne walked down the stairs from the Queen’s lodgings to the courtyard between the Jewel House and the King’s Hall. Two hundred Yeomen were there to lead Anne, her ladies in waiting, Sir Kingston and several others to the scaffold that had been erected. She walked through the courtyard and then through the twin towers of the Coldharbour Gate (which no longer stands) to the scaffold that awaited her. It has been reported that approximately a thousand people surrounded the scaffold upon Tower Green to watch the execution of Anne Boleyn, Queen of England. 

Despite thousands of eyes staring at her Anne is said to have looked composed and dignified. One report states that Anne ‘has never looked more beautiful’ (Fraser 2002, pg. 315). It is great credit to the type of woman that Anne Boleyn was, that in her final moments knowing she was about to die, that she could hold herself with such composure and beauty. 

The scaffold was draped in black cloth and had straw scattered across it. Upon the scaffold waited the French executioner whom was dressed like all the other men to conceal his identity. His sword was hidden under the straw to save Anne seeing the tool that would soon end her life. Slowly Anne took the four steps that lead up to the scaffold and took her place in the centre. She turned and ‘begged leave to speak to the people, promising she would not speak a word that was not good’ (Weir 2009, pg. 266). She then asked Kingston ‘not to hasten the signal for her death till she had spoken that which she had mind to say’ (Weir 2009, pg. 266). 

Turning back to the crowd that was staring so intently at Anne, she took a deep breath and with a voice that wavered at first but grew stronger as she continued Anne spoke…

‘Good Christian people, I am come hither to die, according to the law, for by the law I am judged to die, and therefore I will speak nothing against it. I come here only to die, and thus to yield myself humbly to the will of the King, my lord. And if, in my life, I did ever offend the King’s Grace, surely with my death I do now atone. I come hither to accuse no man, nor to speak anything of that whereof I am accused, as I know full well that aught I say in my defence doth not appertain to you. I pray and beseech you all, good friends, to pray for the life of the King, my sovereign lord and yours, who is one of the best princes on the face of the earth, who has always treated me so well that better could not be, wherefore I submit to death with good will, humbly asking pardon of all the world. If any person will meddle with my cause, I require them to judge the best. Thus I take my leave of the world, and of you, and I heartily desire you all to pray for me. Oh Lord, have mercy on me! To God I commend my soul’ (Weir 2009, pg. 266 – 267).
We can see in her speech that Anne never admits to being guilty of the charges she was condemned for. She admits that she has been found guilty and because of that she will die willingly. She also states that there is no point trying to argue her case because that will not change anything now. She asks people to judge the best of her and then asks for them to pray for her. I think this speech, even following a format and protecting her daughter, shows how clever Anne Boleyn was. In a subtle way Anne never admits her guilt which, without directly saying so, says everything that needs to be said.
Knowing that the Queen’s end was drawing to a close the executioner stepped forward and asked that Anne forgive him for what he was about to do. She willingly forgave him and then he asked her to kneel and say her prayers. Anne knelt and tucked her dress underneath her so that it would not fly about her legs. Some accounts from those who watched the execution say that one of Anne’s ladies in waiting stepped forward to cover her eyes while other reports state that Anne refused to have her eyes covered. 

As a thousand pairs of eyes looked at her Anne repeated over and over the prayer: ‘Jesu, have pity on my soul! My God, have pity on my soul, To Jesus Christ I commend my soul…’ (Weir 2009, pg. 270).  It was only now, in the last few minutes of her life that Anne’s resolve began to falter. It is said that nervously she kept looking over her shoulder waiting for the executioners blow to come. The executioner seeing this turned to his assistant and called ‘bring me the sword’ (Weir 2009, pg. 271). Anne turned her head to look at the steps where the assistant presumably was. In this moment the executioner pulled out his sword from beneath the straw. Lifting it high above his head he swung it several times to built up momentum and then with one swift blow he brought it down severing Anne Boleyn’s neck, her lips still moving in prayer. 

And so it was done, Anne Boleyn, Queen of England, was dead. Anne’s head fell onto the scaffold, her body tumbling after.

 A depiction of Anne Boleyn’s execution by Jan Luyken, c.1664-1712.

What I also find incredibly laughable about all of this, all of these accusations and so called evidence is that for nearly three years Anne Boleyn was able to get away with adultery, incest and treason! For a woman who was almost never allowed to be alone it is extremely hard to believe that she would have found so much free time to come and go with a number of men as she pleased! Anne was the Queen of England; she was a busy woman with many matters to attend to. She was watched constantly by members of court and always had her ladies in waiting about her. There is just far too much evidence to suggest that Anne was not guilty of the charges brought against her. If she was at all guilty of any of these alleged crimes Anne certainly must have been able to work magic to sneak off countless times without anyone knowing! (Perhaps it was from this that the ideas of Anne being involved with witchcraft came from?!)

Also, Anne was an extremely smart woman. She was no young, naïve fool like her cousin Katherine Howard. She knew the ways of court, knew what life was like and she had worked so hard and done so much to get to the place where she was – Queen of England! Why would she risk all of that, all she had done for the opportunity to sleep with five men? I find it extremely hard to believe that Anne would have done such foolish things, not when she was an extraordinarily smart woman and knew the risks.

Anne was also desperate to give Henry the son he so longed for. Considering in those times many people believed it was dangerous to have sexual intercourse in the latter stages of pregnancy for fear that it may harm the child or mother, why would Anne risk losing her child, the possible heir to the English throne, for several reckless affairs?

Another point that should be stressed is that Anne was an extremely religious woman. Throughout her life she had been dedicated to the faith and had helped Henry with the Reformation of the English church. In her final days she had little to cling to but her faith. Before she was to die Anne swore on the sacrament TWICE that she was innocent of all charges and allegations laid against her. Her gaoler, Sir Kingston whom was present while Anne took the Sacrament and confessed her innocence, stated that ‘she sent for me that I might be with her at such time as she received the good Lord, to the intent I should hear her speak as touching her innocency always to be clear’ (Weir 2001, pg. 251). Anne truly believed in her heart that she was innocent and that she would go to heaven to be with God.  Why, when her very soul was at stake, a thing that Anne had proven she did not take lightly, would she lie against the Holy Sacrament? Why would she say she was innocent if she was guilty? This in itself, Anne’s strong faith and her belief in God and the purity of her soul, proves to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that Anne Boleyn was innocent of all crimes tried against her. She knew that lying to God would damn her soul for all eternity. She swore to God she was innocent and in her heart and her confessions she believed she was. 

Yet despite all of this G.W. Bernard in his book “Anne Boleyn Fatal Attractions” proposes that Anne Boleyn in fact did cheat on her husband. He writes that “it remains my own hunch that Anne had indeed committed adultery with Norris, probably with Smeaton, possibly with Weston, and was then the victim of the most appalling bad luck when the countess of Worcester, one of her trusted ladies, contrived in a moment of irritation with her brother to trigger the devastating chain of events that led inexorably to Anne’s downfall.” (Bernard 2011, pg. 192). 

Bernard’s claims that Anne Boleyn was guilty of adultery rest on a poem written in French by Lancelot de Carles, dated 2nd June 1536 (Note: AFTER Anne Boleyn’s trial and execution). The poem claims that one of Anne’s ladies had been caught out by her brother as having an affair with another man and was now pregnant (obviously her husband didn’t know!) Trying to deflect the claims she accused the Queen (Anne) of having an affair with Mark Smeaton. The brother then goes to tell his friends who tell the King and thus Anne’s affairs are discovered.

The woman in this poem is Elizabeth Browne wife of Henry Somerset and she was one of Anne’s ladies and was pregnant. What I find utterly astonishing and completely baffling is that up to this point throughout his book Bernard repeatedly claims that one should not base theories or ideas on here say or singular letters or notes because they may have bias or may not be accurate. But as soon as there is a poem, a poem! Stating that Anne Boleyn was guilty of adultery he jumps right on board. He singles out this one piece of writing, written after Anne Boleyn was tried and executed and uses it as evidence, as proof that she was guilty. How can we be sure that this poem is the truth? How can we be sure that Lancelot de Carles did not hear this story and put it into a poem? Even with all of the evidence above, which clearly points to Anne Boleyn’s innocence, Bernard bases his conclusions on a single poem. Unfortunately to this I do not give a great deal of credence. 

Personally I do not believe that Anne Boleyn ever cheated on her husband Henry VIII. For a woman whom lead her life in the spot light, who was constantly surrounded by her ladies in waiting and members of court I simply do not think it was possible. Anne Boleyn was an incredibly smart woman, she would have known the risks if she did have an affair. Certainly she enjoyed flirting and the game of courtly love, yes she was probably quite frustrated and worried about not being able to bear her husband a longed for son but that is not enough to suggest she ever cheated on Henry VIII. Anne was also an extremely religious woman and to swear upon the sacrament twice that she was innocent when she was not was a certain way to damn her soul. Even almost five hundred years after Anne’s death I simply do not think there is enough evidence to suggest that she betrayed her marriage vows.


Sources

Bernard, G.W. 2010, Anne Boleyn Fatal Attractions, Yale University Press, London. 

Fraser, A 2002, The Six Wives of Henry VIII, Phoenix Press, London.

Ives, E 2005, The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Australia. 

Ridgway, C 2010, The Anne Boleyn Files, viewed 1st October 2011, <http://www.theanneboleynfiles.com/>.

Starkey, D. 2004, Six Wives The Queens of Henry VIII, Vintage Books, London. 

Weir, A 1991, The Six Wives of Henry VIII, Grove Press, New York. 

Weir, A 2009, The Lady in The Tower The Fall of Anne Boleyn, Jonathan Cape, London.