Anne Boleyn Guilty or Innocent? Part 3


Anne Boleyn Guilty or Innocent?
Part 3
On May 19th at 9am, or perhaps a little before, Anne was to leave her chambers in the Queen’s lodgings for the last time. Three years ago she had stayed in the very same lodgings on the night before her coronation. As she left the Queen’s lodgings Anne was accompanied by four ladies in waiting. Leaving her chambers Anne walked down the stairs from the Queen’s lodgings to the courtyard between the Jewel House and the King’s Hall. Two hundred Yeomen were there to lead Anne, her ladies in waiting, Sir Kingston and several others to the scaffold that had been erected. She walked through the courtyard and then through the twin towers of the Coldharbour Gate (which no longer stands) to the scaffold that awaited her. It has been reported that approximately a thousand people surrounded the scaffold upon Tower Green to watch the execution of Anne Boleyn, Queen of England. 

Despite thousands of eyes staring at her Anne is said to have looked composed and dignified. One report states that Anne ‘has never looked more beautiful’ (Fraser 2002, pg. 315). It is great credit to the type of woman that Anne Boleyn was, that in her final moments knowing she was about to die, that she could hold herself with such composure and beauty. 

The scaffold was draped in black cloth and had straw scattered across it. Upon the scaffold waited the French executioner whom was dressed like all the other men to conceal his identity. His sword was hidden under the straw to save Anne seeing the tool that would soon end her life. Slowly Anne took the four steps that lead up to the scaffold and took her place in the centre. She turned and ‘begged leave to speak to the people, promising she would not speak a word that was not good’ (Weir 2009, pg. 266). She then asked Kingston ‘not to hasten the signal for her death till she had spoken that which she had mind to say’ (Weir 2009, pg. 266). 

Turning back to the crowd that was staring so intently at Anne, she took a deep breath and with a voice that wavered at first but grew stronger as she continued Anne spoke…

‘Good Christian people, I am come hither to die, according to the law, for by the law I am judged to die, and therefore I will speak nothing against it. I come here only to die, and thus to yield myself humbly to the will of the King, my lord. And if, in my life, I did ever offend the King’s Grace, surely with my death I do now atone. I come hither to accuse no man, nor to speak anything of that whereof I am accused, as I know full well that aught I say in my defence doth not appertain to you. I pray and beseech you all, good friends, to pray for the life of the King, my sovereign lord and yours, who is one of the best princes on the face of the earth, who has always treated me so well that better could not be, wherefore I submit to death with good will, humbly asking pardon of all the world. If any person will meddle with my cause, I require them to judge the best. Thus I take my leave of the world, and of you, and I heartily desire you all to pray for me. Oh Lord, have mercy on me! To God I commend my soul’ (Weir 2009, pg. 266 – 267).
We can see in her speech that Anne never admits to being guilty of the charges she was condemned for. She admits that she has been found guilty and because of that she will die willingly. She also states that there is no point trying to argue her case because that will not change anything now. She asks people to judge the best of her and then asks for them to pray for her. I think this speech, even following a format and protecting her daughter, shows how clever Anne Boleyn was. In a subtle way Anne never admits her guilt which, without directly saying so, says everything that needs to be said.
Knowing that the Queen’s end was drawing to a close the executioner stepped forward and asked that Anne forgive him for what he was about to do. She willingly forgave him and then he asked her to kneel and say her prayers. Anne knelt and tucked her dress underneath her so that it would not fly about her legs. Some accounts from those who watched the execution say that one of Anne’s ladies in waiting stepped forward to cover her eyes while other reports state that Anne refused to have her eyes covered. 

As a thousand pairs of eyes looked at her Anne repeated over and over the prayer: ‘Jesu, have pity on my soul! My God, have pity on my soul, To Jesus Christ I commend my soul…’ (Weir 2009, pg. 270).  It was only now, in the last few minutes of her life that Anne’s resolve began to falter. It is said that nervously she kept looking over her shoulder waiting for the executioners blow to come. The executioner seeing this turned to his assistant and called ‘bring me the sword’ (Weir 2009, pg. 271). Anne turned her head to look at the steps where the assistant presumably was. In this moment the executioner pulled out his sword from beneath the straw. Lifting it high above his head he swung it several times to built up momentum and then with one swift blow he brought it down severing Anne Boleyn’s neck, her lips still moving in prayer. 

And so it was done, Anne Boleyn, Queen of England, was dead. Anne’s head fell onto the scaffold, her body tumbling after.

 A depiction of Anne Boleyn’s execution by Jan Luyken, c.1664-1712.

What I also find incredibly laughable about all of this, all of these accusations and so called evidence is that for nearly three years Anne Boleyn was able to get away with adultery, incest and treason! For a woman who was almost never allowed to be alone it is extremely hard to believe that she would have found so much free time to come and go with a number of men as she pleased! Anne was the Queen of England; she was a busy woman with many matters to attend to. She was watched constantly by members of court and always had her ladies in waiting about her. There is just far too much evidence to suggest that Anne was not guilty of the charges brought against her. If she was at all guilty of any of these alleged crimes Anne certainly must have been able to work magic to sneak off countless times without anyone knowing! (Perhaps it was from this that the ideas of Anne being involved with witchcraft came from?!)

Also, Anne was an extremely smart woman. She was no young, naïve fool like her cousin Katherine Howard. She knew the ways of court, knew what life was like and she had worked so hard and done so much to get to the place where she was – Queen of England! Why would she risk all of that, all she had done for the opportunity to sleep with five men? I find it extremely hard to believe that Anne would have done such foolish things, not when she was an extraordinarily smart woman and knew the risks.

Anne was also desperate to give Henry the son he so longed for. Considering in those times many people believed it was dangerous to have sexual intercourse in the latter stages of pregnancy for fear that it may harm the child or mother, why would Anne risk losing her child, the possible heir to the English throne, for several reckless affairs?

Another point that should be stressed is that Anne was an extremely religious woman. Throughout her life she had been dedicated to the faith and had helped Henry with the Reformation of the English church. In her final days she had little to cling to but her faith. Before she was to die Anne swore on the sacrament TWICE that she was innocent of all charges and allegations laid against her. Her gaoler, Sir Kingston whom was present while Anne took the Sacrament and confessed her innocence, stated that ‘she sent for me that I might be with her at such time as she received the good Lord, to the intent I should hear her speak as touching her innocency always to be clear’ (Weir 2001, pg. 251). Anne truly believed in her heart that she was innocent and that she would go to heaven to be with God.  Why, when her very soul was at stake, a thing that Anne had proven she did not take lightly, would she lie against the Holy Sacrament? Why would she say she was innocent if she was guilty? This in itself, Anne’s strong faith and her belief in God and the purity of her soul, proves to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that Anne Boleyn was innocent of all crimes tried against her. She knew that lying to God would damn her soul for all eternity. She swore to God she was innocent and in her heart and her confessions she believed she was. 

Yet despite all of this G.W. Bernard in his book “Anne Boleyn Fatal Attractions” proposes that Anne Boleyn in fact did cheat on her husband. He writes that “it remains my own hunch that Anne had indeed committed adultery with Norris, probably with Smeaton, possibly with Weston, and was then the victim of the most appalling bad luck when the countess of Worcester, one of her trusted ladies, contrived in a moment of irritation with her brother to trigger the devastating chain of events that led inexorably to Anne’s downfall.” (Bernard 2011, pg. 192). 

Bernard’s claims that Anne Boleyn was guilty of adultery rest on a poem written in French by Lancelot de Carles, dated 2nd June 1536 (Note: AFTER Anne Boleyn’s trial and execution). The poem claims that one of Anne’s ladies had been caught out by her brother as having an affair with another man and was now pregnant (obviously her husband didn’t know!) Trying to deflect the claims she accused the Queen (Anne) of having an affair with Mark Smeaton. The brother then goes to tell his friends who tell the King and thus Anne’s affairs are discovered.

The woman in this poem is Elizabeth Browne wife of Henry Somerset and she was one of Anne’s ladies and was pregnant. What I find utterly astonishing and completely baffling is that up to this point throughout his book Bernard repeatedly claims that one should not base theories or ideas on here say or singular letters or notes because they may have bias or may not be accurate. But as soon as there is a poem, a poem! Stating that Anne Boleyn was guilty of adultery he jumps right on board. He singles out this one piece of writing, written after Anne Boleyn was tried and executed and uses it as evidence, as proof that she was guilty. How can we be sure that this poem is the truth? How can we be sure that Lancelot de Carles did not hear this story and put it into a poem? Even with all of the evidence above, which clearly points to Anne Boleyn’s innocence, Bernard bases his conclusions on a single poem. Unfortunately to this I do not give a great deal of credence. 

Personally I do not believe that Anne Boleyn ever cheated on her husband Henry VIII. For a woman whom lead her life in the spot light, who was constantly surrounded by her ladies in waiting and members of court I simply do not think it was possible. Anne Boleyn was an incredibly smart woman, she would have known the risks if she did have an affair. Certainly she enjoyed flirting and the game of courtly love, yes she was probably quite frustrated and worried about not being able to bear her husband a longed for son but that is not enough to suggest she ever cheated on Henry VIII. Anne was also an extremely religious woman and to swear upon the sacrament twice that she was innocent when she was not was a certain way to damn her soul. Even almost five hundred years after Anne’s death I simply do not think there is enough evidence to suggest that she betrayed her marriage vows.


Sources

Bernard, G.W. 2010, Anne Boleyn Fatal Attractions, Yale University Press, London. 

Fraser, A 2002, The Six Wives of Henry VIII, Phoenix Press, London.

Ives, E 2005, The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Australia. 

Ridgway, C 2010, The Anne Boleyn Files, viewed 1st October 2011, <http://www.theanneboleynfiles.com/>.

Starkey, D. 2004, Six Wives The Queens of Henry VIII, Vintage Books, London. 

Weir, A 1991, The Six Wives of Henry VIII, Grove Press, New York. 

Weir, A 2009, The Lady in The Tower The Fall of Anne Boleyn, Jonathan Cape, London.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Excellent points! I couldn't agree more, Anne was innocent.

Anonymous said...

Very interesting!

Anonymous said...

Great article.I can easily believe that Anne Boleyn was innocent. God rest her soul.
dsbraden@gmail.com Deborah Braden

Princess of Eboli said...

In my personal opinion she could have done few bad things, normal for the era to protect her reign, but not that she deserved to died that way. Your article very good, and interesting...:)

Post a Comment